Popular at a Cost: Psychology Students Rate Their Department

Annabelle Scribe
Ivy and Oak University

Psychology graduate students at Ivy and Oak University (IOU) were unhappy. They were paying huge tuition fees, $25,000 a year, and going deeply in debt to attend this prestigious private school, but were unable to find good jobs in their field. The students felt that faculty-course evaluations were biased toward popularity at the expense of competence. Popular professors were promoted: Highly competent but less popular instructors were denied tenure. The faculty was becoming increasingly mediocre as a consequence, devaluing their degrees in the job market. They designed a survey to test this hypothesis.

The survey included questions to measure the competence of the instructor, the demands of the course, and popularity. Also included was an assessment of physical appearance. The grad students hypothesized that instructors that were physically attractive would be more popular. These instructors could "spend" some of that popularity by teaching more demanding courses. One metric of physical appearance is the Body Mass Index (BMI). This index is computed by dividing the weight in kilograms by the square of the person's height in meters. A BMI over 25 is considered overweight: A BMI over 30 qualifies as obese. Stature was measured on a 3-point scale: (short, men under 5 ft 4 in [163 cm], women under 5 ft [152 cm); medium; and (tall, men 6 ft [183 cm] and above, women 5 ft 10 in and above [178 cm]). All other measures were on a 5-point scale. It was also noted whether faculty were tenured, or not.

The survey was sent to all 3rd- and 4th-year students majoring in psychology at IOU. There were 237 surveys returned, with just 9 discarded as unusable. Instructors with high popularity scores (M = 4.5, Mdn = 4, SD = 0.9), rated only average on competence (M = 2.8, Mdn = 2, SD = 1.5). But as expected, instructors rating high in attractiveness (BMI < 25) were both somewhat popular (M = 3.8, Mdn = 4, SD = 1.3), and very competent (M = 4.1, Mdn = 4, SD = 1.2). Just five faculty, 11%, fell into this group. Still, the results were highly significant, t(229) = 2.918, p < .01. Tenured male professors (n = 16) had an average BMI of 32, with an average height of 5 ft 9 in (175 cm), and average body weight of 216 lb (98 kg). There were just three tenured female instructors so results were inconclusive. Nontenured faculty had a BMI = 24.3.

A extensive and elaborate statistical analysis of the data was conducted using SPSS, but the students could make no sense of the data. The statistics requirement for a degree in psychology had been dropped in 1998.
|